[GHHF] Ayodhya verdict is similar to – “you grab it, we legitimize it” Meeting to discuss the Verdict on Saturday (October 2) at 4:00 pm in Dallas and 5 other cities
10/1/2010
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edmund Burke
Three Judge bench of Allahabad court of Lucknow Bench in a majority decision ruled on Thursday that Ram was born at the spot and that his idol should remain there. The verdict states unequivocally that the disputed site is the birthplace of Ram. The court's observation that the "disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Muslims." In its judgment court says that it was built over a destroyed temple.
Justice S U Khan said let the land be divided in three parts, one each for the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha – the party for Lord Ram. Khan said the area where Ram's idol is should be given to Hindus. Muslims to be given a separate portion of the courtyard, and third litigant Nirmohi Akhara another section of the courtyard.
The Courts itself contracted itself in making the judgment. It agreed that the “disputed site” was the birthplace of Lord Rama. If that is the case, how can the Court say that they divide the land into three parts and distribute it to three groups?
It is a sketchy, patchy, fearful, instigated, illegal, arbitrary, political, and appeasement judgment. It has crossed it’s legal boundaries of jurisdiction.
First of all the judgment is surprising and astonishing because of the fact that none the plaintiffs has asked for the division of the land into three parts. Court clearly went beyond it’s jurisdiction. The decision is more of political nature to appease the Muslims than a legal, rational, logical decision. This unprecedented ruling is going to pave the way for others to ask for legitimacy of occupying all the Hindu Temples that were converted into masjids. This decision has more implications for the usurpation of Hindu Lands and Hindu Temples. It should be challenged on the ground that no plaintiff has asked for the division and also that the court went beyond it’s legal nature of the case. It should not take a political decision on the issues.
What the Allahabad High Court said is that “you grab Hindu lands and demolish Hindu Temple, we will legitimize it.” The court said we will follow the government policy of “you grab it, we regularize it.” Can any body find the difference between the Court’s judgment and political appeasement?
Please join the discussion group to express your views on the verdict – whether it is favorable to Hindus or not on this Saturday.
Global Hindu Heritage Foundation is organizing meetings to discuss about the implications of this verdict in the following cities in USA:
1) Dallas, Texas
Meeting Details:
Date: October 2, 2010 (Saturday)
Time 4:00 pm
Place: L.E.R. Schimelpfenig Library
5024 Custer Road, Plano TX 75023
TV9 is expected to cover the discussion.
2) Chicago, Illinois
Contact: Prasad Yalamachi for the time and date
3) New Jersey
Contact: Satya for details
4) Orlando, Florida
Contact: Bharat at 407-970-5511
5) Raleigh, North Carolina
Contact: Raju at 919-303-0247
ENCOURAGE:
Please encourage all your friends to attend these meetings closer to their place
Allahabad Court Judgment
The essence of the judgment is to divide the Rama Janmabhumi to be divide into three portions as follows:
1) Central Portion of Temple Area where murties are installed - Rama Lalla
2) Platform and Kitchen Area - Nirmohi Akhara
3) Area where both both Hindus and Moslems had been worshipping together for many decades – Muslims.
Link to the Judgment
You can visit the website to get more detailed information:
Visit us online:
