Tharoor’s book “Why I Am a Hindu.” Review Part 2

19 Mar 2018 285 Views

He Calls Hindu leaders as Goondas and Hooligans; Becomes Islamicvadi.


As I mentioned in our earlier review, we will address some of the outrageous, twisted, warped, and dishonest statements Tharoor made in the last three chapters. In fact, we could challenge almost all his statements with more facts, with more historical evidence and with more honesty. Only few statements will be selected and addressed for our review and assessment.

To read Part 1, click on this link:

Tharoor observed that “When the Hindutvavadis demanded that all Indians declare ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ as a litmus test of their nationalism, many of us insisted that no Indian should be obliged to mouth a slogan he did not believe in his heart.  If some Muslims, for instance, felt that their religion did not allow them to hail their motherland as a goddess, the Constitution of India gave them the right not to.  Hindutva wrongly seeks to deny them this right. (p: 278)

Tharoor also says that "To the Hindutvavadis, India is a pure Hindu land that has been invaded, attacked, humiliated, conquered, subjugated and is now free to find its own expression which to their mind must necessarily be that of a Hindu land.”That is absolutely right.

Atleast we can find one statement by Tharoor who gauged the Hindu sentiments. In Hindu land there is no discrimination, no appeasement, no communalism, no secularism, no exclusivity. Diversity is accepted, inclusiveness is practiced, and tolerance is promoted realizing that other religions have their belief system.

Their belief system is antithetical Hinduism and Hindutva. They do not tolerate our faith, do not accept our way of living, abhor idol worship, detest secularism, despise democracy, crush freedom and kill nonbelievers. Tharoor would not comment on Muslim ideology, belief system, or Quranic injunction of non-believers. By not accepting what Muslims believe and how Quran treats non-believers, Tharoor tacitly has become Islamicvadi – who becomes their spokesperson by saying that Islam is a peaceful religion like Hinduism. Tharoor recalls the conversation between Gandhi and Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

Gandhi became an example of tolerance and acceptance of other religions while Mohammad Ali Jinnah stood firm being a Muslim rejecting tolerance. Mahatma Gandhi said: “I am a Hindu, a Muslim, a Christian, a Parsi, a Jew.” It is equally valid to recall Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s riposte: “Only a Hindu could say that.”

A Muslim will never accept or acknowledge Hindus. Their aim is to change Bharath inti Islamic State. If Tharoor can read, understand and digest these two statements, he would not have called Hindus intolerant. His obsession to protect Muslims, not even pronounce one word about Quranic injunctions and Sharia law is beyond any body’s guess.

For his political future, he will sacrifice 80 percent Hindus and gleefully offer Bharat in a sliver plate to his Muslim goondas.

By defying the facts and the reality, Tharoor refused to see the Muslim atrocities and hear about their endless, relentless torture and killing of Hindus.  He is criticizing the Hindu religion which is inclusive and pardoning exclusive religions like Islam and Christianity.  Hindus are damned for being open and democratic. Islam is praised making India the richest based on GDP; but he never mentioned it was due to the mass murders of Hindus. When you one keeps slaughtering the people and reduce the population by 20 percent, obviously the GDP will increase. It is not because of the Muslim work force or their work ethic, India was the richest in the 17th century.

Th Constitution of India states that "India, that is Bharat, shall be a union of states”. There were extensive deliberations on whether Bharath should precede the name of India. Hindus lost that argument and Muslims and Secularists won the laurels to make India precede Bharath. Since India is Bharath, why would Tharoor would have problem if all citizens of India are required to say “Bharath Mata ki Jai.

Only one who would have problem would be either a Muslim or a Islamicvadi. It clear that he has taken the responsibility of championing the Muslim demands for exclusivity, killing, torture, sharia law, fatwas and destruction. Furthermore, what we call India is always identified as Hindustan.

Even today, many Arabs call our country as Hindustan. The word India has no meaning. It is thrusted on us by British. It has brief history. Bharath has long enriching and glorified history.  Many people relate to Bharath more than India. Bharath is a combination of three words with meaning. ‘Bha’ from Bhavam or expression, ‘Ra’ from Ragam or melody, and ‘Ta’ from Thalam or rhythm.

This interpretation renders an impressive enriching diversity, lushness and harmony. That is Bharath. Tharoor thinks that since the Muslims do not believe in mouthing the slogan in their heart, they can say almost anything.

This elusive, deceptive and surrogate theology, Tharoor may even allow Muslims to mouth the slogan “Pakistan kijindabad” since Muslims believe in their heart to be for their interest. He is saying that whatever Muslims want to do they have his permission, encouragement and seal of approval to dismantle the India and make it an Islamic Country.

If a Muslim is allowed not to say Bharath Mata Ki jai because he did not believe in his heart, Tharoor is saying that since Allah is greater than any country and since Allah says it is the responsibility of a Muslim to convert the whole humanity to Islam, a Muslim should be permitted. A Muslim who believes that democracy is incompatible with Islam, he is allowed to wage a war, terrorize and torture until their unfinished business is finished.

The Constitution of Pakistan, part IX, article 227 says, "All existing laws shall be brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Quran and Sunnah” As late as January 31, 2016, Tamil Nadu ThowheedJamath (TNTJ) vowed to end Idol worship and Hindu practices and all others which are not according to ‘real Islam’.

ISIS like organizations are sprouting across the country. Ant-Shirk Conference declared that it is sin to worship idols and they should be destroyed.  Once Muslims have the power and make laws based on Quran and Hadiths, All Hindus will have to follow these rules, failing which can result in severe punishments and deaths.

More than that, all Hindus would lose their freedom to express because that would be incompatible with Islamic Jurisprudence. It would have drastic effect on Bharath as a country for generations to come. M.R. Shamshad, practicing lawyer says, “majority of those practising Islam consider the laws of the Shariat to be completely correct and so they cannot be subjected to legislative changes considering the fact that freedom of religion, practices and so on, are part of fundamental rights.”

It has implications for India as well as Hindus. They will try to slowly increase their population in the next 40-50 years and change the constitution of India into Islamic Constitution like Pakistan. Tharoor becomes Islamicvadi by Default. Some examples of Sharia LAW:

  • -   Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand
  • -   Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
  • -   Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
  • -   A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
  • -   A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
  • -   A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
  • -   A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
  • -   Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
  • -   A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
  • -   A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
  • -   A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
  • -   Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
  • -   A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
  • -   A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
  • -   A woman  inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
  • -   A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
  • -   A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
  • -   Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
  • -   Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
  • -   A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim
  • -   A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body, which is considered "Awrah," a sexual organ.
  • -   All the Hindu Temples could be demolished since they are against “idolaters.”
  • -   Taharush is the Arab word that denotes the encircling of girls and women by group of Muslim men for sexual harassment, including assaults, groping and even rapes. The seizure of Infidel females and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Koran.

Islamicvadi Tharoor laments on the death of 50 Muslims and ignores more than 100 million Hindu Deaths

Tharoor laments that “Since the ascent of the BJP to power, the forces unleashed by the dominance of Hindutva have resulted in many incidents of violence.  In one grim reckoning, more than fifty individuals have been killed in anti-minority acts of violence since mid-2014, and dozens of others stripped, beaten and humiliated.” (182).

Does he know how many Hindus were killed by Muslims over the last ten centuries? Let us accept his numbers that 50 individuals were killed since BJP came into power.

He cries out loud and shed tears about these 50 people. calculating the percentage of those killed out of 1.3 billion. It is insane, brainless, deceptive, crooked, crony, belligerent on part of the author without looking at the history. In this statement his time line is less than 4 years. He totally erased the history by not even mentioning the number of Hindus killed. In fact, he has become a spokesperson Muslims implicitly encouraging them to wage a war against Hindus and make India an Islamic Nation.

Tharoor has no problem of Muslims killing Hindus

According to some sources Muslims may have killed more than 100 million Hindus.  For example, Aurangzeb killed 5 million in 20 years. Bahmani Sultans had an agenda to kill 100,000 every year for 250 years only is South India. These two numbers add up to 25 million. And murdering civilians was going on through the country simultaneously. Bahmani Sultans were only tip of the iceberg. Babur killed 1 million in 3 years.

Even emperor Akbar killed 2 million during initial decades of his rule, though he softened a bit later. Timor Lang [Tamerlane] killed 1 million in 1 month. Qassim killed 2 million people. Ghazni Mohammed and Gouri Mohammed together killed nearly 30 million during their added total of 30 invasions. Tipu Sultan in south killed 10 million. In Bengal Muslims killed nearly 30 million.

Regular incursions from the Arabs, Iranians, etc. killed nearly 50 million. Nadir Shah killed 100000 civilians in one day.

Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observes “Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands.

The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers.” Muslim historian Firishta [full name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, the author of the Tarikh-iFirishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim}, declared that over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India.

Survivors got enslaved and castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion.

Is THAROOR Proud of His Muslim Friends atrocities against Hindus - Examples of “Religion of Peace” atrocities

Sheer total silence by the secularists, intellectuals, media, Congress Party, Communist Party and liberals is so dangerous it may make Hindus sacrificial lambs in the hands of Muslims and these political parties.

These secularists deliberately diverting the attention of the media and their fellow Hindu haters toward minor incidents at the expense of thousands of Hindus welfare and lives. Countries in which Muslims are in minority, they always fight for minority rights. Countries in which Muslims are in majority, they do not grant minority rights.

They have not either read the history of Islamic atrocities, pretend that they never happened, understood the violent and terrorist verses in Quran, or totally sold their souls for the cause of Islam for their selfish political or financial reasons.

Tharoor says Hindus and Hindutva is violent and intolerant

He said the Hindutva being propagated by some people nowadays is not the Hinduism most of the Hindus know.“It is a belligerent, intolerant and violent political ideology masquerading as the religious faith, which it is not.

That’s why I thought it is time to write about Hinduism that Hindus like me have grown up in India.” (New Indian Express; March 3, 2018) The Supreme Court ruling of 1995 declares that, "No precise meaning can be ascribed to the terms 'Hindu', 'Hindutva' and 'Hinduism'; and no meaning in the abstract can confine it to the narrow limits of religion alone, excluding the content of Indian culture and heritage … Hindutva is indicative more of the way of life of the Indian people. …Considering Hindutva as hostile, inimical, or intolerant of other faiths, or as communal proceeds from an improper appreciation of its true meaning.”

Tharoor want to mislead, deceive and misinform the Hindus especially the secularists by distorting the true meanings of the three words. He even misinterpreted the Supreme Court and he may have called the Supreme Court a goonda or hooligan. Tharoor has a choice to make as to whether his characterization of Hindutva hostile is based on his improper appreciation of the true meaning or he can call Supreme Court as bigoted and intolerant. If they are so intolerant why would a Hindu keep the Christ picture in their family room.

Why would many of the spiritual leaders adorn their ashrams with the symbols of all religions including the most bastardly Abrahamic religions, Christianity and Islam.  Why Hindus like Tharoor would not even question when Muslims shout five times by saying Allaho Akbar- Allah is great.  Can Tharoor find any Muslim and Christian leaders who would say that all religions are same and acknowledge the existence of different paths to reach the divine? Mohammad Ali Jinnah says,“the Islamic state is an agency for enforcement of the Quranic principles and injunctions". For Tharoor, Quranic injunctions and principles are not violent. Peaceful Hinduism becomes violent and intolerant. Asking people to follow the path of non-violence is violence for Tharoor.

Mohan Bhagavat on February 26, 2018 Bhagwat has urged India’s Hindus to come together. In mid-December, he asserted that the meaning of Hindutva is to unite all communities, adding that anyone living in the country is automatically a Hindu. “The Muslims in India are also Hindus,” the RSS chief had stated. Reiterating this on Sunday, Bhagwat stated: “Whoever believes that ‘Bharat Mata’ is his mother is an Indian and a Hindu. But some people don’t realize this.”

As Dr. Subramanian Swamy stated on numerous occasions that “We are all one community - all are Hindustanis and our ancestors were Hindus. Even when it comes to Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and Buddhists, all have the same DNA.” Earlier in his talk, Dr Swamy emphasized the richness of Indian civilization and said, "India is the only country considered by UNESCO as having unbroken continuing civilization out of the 46 civilizations in the world. Even the Greece is not what it was in the past, nor is Egypt or Iran. Forty-five civilizations have disappeared due to invasions and conquers. Only 46 civilizations are surviving though they have been attacked or ruled for centuries.”

Being a scholar and writer, Tharoor should not have any gripes to investigate either to acknowledge or reject. That is only academic. Let us hope that nobody would be so bigoted to reject the proposal to conduct scientific study.

All these 46 civilizations disappeared because of Hindutva intolerance and violence or Islamic and Christian Violence and intolerance. One does not have to be as intelligent as Tharoor to find out who was responsible for violent over throw of these civilizations.

It is time to refresh the memories of Islamic atrocities on Hindus at the time of Independence as reported by Time Magazine on 8th September 1947. “You have full liberty to go the limit. Take revenge as you like, but if there is one Hindu or Sikh left alive in my district after you are through, I swear to kill them myself.” – Deputy Commissioner of a Western Punjab District in Pakistan to young Muslims

The Time Magazine describes what they saw on the platform in West Pakistan. Hindus were planning to board the train to go to India. The reporter found the station platform utterly deserted except for several hundred dead Hindus and Sikhs lying around the platform, apparently slaughtered only a few hours before while waiting for the train to escape. All these people were workers in a textile mill which had been attacked by Moslems. Their bodies were mostly stripped, and, in several instances, limbs had been torn from the bodies. The wife of a British textile factory manager told how a Moslem mob had attacked the Hindu and Sikh workers in another factory. When Moslems broke into the ground floor, the Sikhs slashed the throats of their own wives, and afterwards tried to fight through themselves. All were killed.”

So much for Tharoor’s indifference and silence toward the Islamic atrocities.

The words of its founder K.B. Hedgewar is worth remembering: “The Hindu culture is the life-breath of Hindustan. It is therefore clear that if Hindustan is to be protected, we should first nourish the Hindu culture. If the Hindu culture perishes in Hindustan itself, and if the Hindu society ceases to exist, it will hardly be appropriate to refer to the mere geographical entity that remains as Hindustan. Mere geographical lumps do not make a nation. The entire society should be in such a vigilant and organized condition that no one would dare to cast an evil eye on any of our points of honor,” is how Hedgewar explained the RSS’s mission.

If it is not for Hindutvavadis like RSS who is doing an exemplary work uniting people and instilling the tolerance and non-violence, India would have been converted to either Christianity or Islam long before.  It is because of RSS, we feel proud of our values, morals, ethics, heroes from Itihasas. Their dedication and selfless service to Bharath is unmatched. It is not for them we will still be under emergency or authoritarian rule imposed by Indira Gandhi. It was Tharoor’s party that supported the emergency depriving the freedom to the entire society.

Conveniently, dubiously, deceptively, deliberately ignoring the rapes, tortures, destruction, killing, looting and terror of Muslims will not give an iota of credence for blaming the Hindus. He is in bed with Muslims and Christians for his own name and fame. He wanted to redeem the Gandhi family, Nehru dynasty and the so called secular ideology without digesting the true nature of Hinduism and why the Hindutva people are so alarmed at the prospect of derailing the Hindu train with deliberate effort to run the minority train for their selfish, cowardly acts.

Tharoor also wanted to deflect the attention of the reader by saying that Nehru was so concerned about communalism, that “Nehru had warned that the communalism of the majority was especially dangerous because it could present itself as nationalist.” (273) The fact is that it is Congress Party that Tharoor embraced and Nehru whom he admires are the reason for communalism. His strategy is very simple. Never find fault with Gandhis and Nehru.

Attribute weaknesses and faults of philosophy of the Nehrus to Hindus because he knows that media and liberals are behind him applauding his deceptive effort. If there is no Nehru, there is no communalism. Nehru admonished the then President Dr. Rajendra Prasad not to attend the inaugural function of Somnath Temple. In fact, Nehru never wished to build Somnath, nor did he say that it was destroyed repeatedly due to religious fanaticism.

He supported the Islamic hegemony and made deals with Kashmiri Muslims. Hera are few examples of Islamic atrocities and brutality inflicted on Hindus and how the Hindu nations were decimated. It is a known fact that before the advent of Islam, most of the present day Arab countries were either Hindu or Buddhist. Their presence was obliterated.  Tharoor would not worry about the nations being converted to Islam, Tharoor would not have anything to with the biggest holocaust of Hindus, he would not even admonish the Muslims for destroying thousands of Hindu Temples and how they built Mosques by using the Hindu images of Gods and Goddesses, and even do not talk about the Goa inquisition where Thousands of Hindus were either killed or converted in Goa.

Will Durant said, “The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.

Hindu Kush Mountains – The present Afghanistan is a Muslim country. Before 1200 AD it was a Hindu and Buddhist nation. Our scriptures talk about Kandahar. There were many Buddhist images carved on the mountains. After Islamic advances to Afghanistan, most of these Hindus and Buddhists were either killed, forced or converted.  Encyclopedia Americana says of Hindu Kush: “The name means literally ‘Kills the Hindu’, a reminder of the days when Hindu slaves from Indian subcontinent died in harsh Afghan mountains while being transported to Moslem courts of Central Asia. Encyclopedia Britannica for its part mentions “that the name Hindu Kush first appears in 1333 AD in the writings of Ibn Battuta, the medieval Berber traveler, who said the name meant ‘Hindu Killer’, a meaning still given by Afghan mountain dwellers. Unlike the Jewish holocaust, the exact toll of the Hindu genocide suggested by the name Hindu Kush is not available. “However, writes Hindu Kush specialist Srinandan Vyas, the number is easily likely to be in millions”.The Congress government tried to erase the memory of the biggest holocaust by not imparting this knowledge to Hindu children.

What happened to more than 2000 Temples? Hindu Temples – What Happened to Them is a two-volume book by Sita Ram Goel, Arun Shourie, Harsh Narain, Jay Dubashi and Ram Swarup. The first volume was published in the Spring of 1990.The first volume includes a list of 2,000 mosques that were built on Hindu temples, based primarily on the books of Muslim historians of the period or inscriptions found on mosques. Arun Shourie unequivocally states, “The fact that templeswere broken, and mosques constructed in their place is well known. Nor is the fact that the materials of the temples-the stones and idols—wereused in constructing the mosque, news. It was thought that this was theway to announce hegemony.” No body disputed with facts and evidence.

The most sacred places for Hindus such as Ayodhya, Mathura, Kasi, Lepakshi and many temples were destroyed and built mosques in front of them. Can Tharoor list any Mosques that were destroyed and built Hindu Temples on their respective sites.

Tharoor Hates Hindutvavadis; Becomes Islamicvadi

Tharoor says, “As a believing Hindu, I cannot agree with the Hindutvavadis.  Indeed, I am ashamed of what they are doing while claiming to be acting in the name of my faith.  The violence is particularly sickening: it has led hundreds of thousands of Hindus across India to protest with placards screaming, ‘Not in My Name’.  as I have explained throughout this book, and would like to reiterate, I have always prided myself on belonging to a religion of astonishing breadth and range of belief; a religion that acknowledges all ways of worshipping God as equally valid – indeed, the only major religion in the world that does not claim to be the only true religion.

As I have often asked: How dare a bunch of goondas shrink the soaring majesty of the Vedas and the Upanishads to the petty bigotry of their brand of identity politics? Being a Islamicvadi, he must please his base – Muslims, Christians and Gandhi family. It is his party that said that Muslims have the priority in the resources of India. It is the Muslims who ruled India for nearly ten centuries with iron fist looting, killing and converting Hindus to their blood thirst religion.

Tharoor is siding with these thugs to rampage the country and working to make India into another Islamic country along with 58 Islamic counties next door. He has a problem of looking beyond India and before Babri Masjid incident. He is so clever that he talks about how Muslims inflicted have done to Hindus but never learned an iota of the message. It could be that he zealously joyful at the destruction of Hindu Temple and potential annihilation of Hindus. Nobody can be as short sighted as he is based on his conclusions.

He calls the patriots who defended the country during emergency imposed by his then leader of his Congress Party, India Gandhi as “goondas”. These are the real Hindus goondas who sacrificed their life and protected Hinduism from the clutches of his boss. As I said before his time span is only what matters to him but not what the history reveals. He is obsessed to prove his hatred toward Hindutvavadis by distorting the history and evidence. If there is anyone who hijacked Hinduism he so dearly describes, it is his party that denied Hindus the freedom to manage their temples and protecting the lives of so many political leaders.

His acknowledgment of the greatness Hinduism and his conclusions are diametrically opposed. He says, “Hinduism, with its openness, its respect for variety, its acceptance of all other faiths, is one religion which has always been able to assert itself without threatening others.”  Despite all their bloody history, insinuating verses in their holy books and open threats to dismantle Hinduism, Tharoor keeps talking about “acceptance of all other faiths.”

Let us ask one simple question. For Tharoor it must be very simple since he is concerned about the things that matter him. Can he name any religious leaders pf the two Abrahamic religions who would say that all religions are same? Can he find any of the leaders of Abrahamic religions who would say that they would respect Hinduism?                Tharoor bemoans with the statement that “It is this doctrine of universal acceptance that has been increasingly called into question by the acolytes of Hindutva. Vivekananda had given his fellow Hindus a character certificate many of them no longer deserve.  ‘The Hindus have their faults,’ Vivekananda added, but ‘…they are always for punishing their own bodies, and never for cutting the throats of their neighbours.  If the Hindu fanatic burns himself on the pyre, he never lights the fire of Inquisition.” (270)

It is not Hindu fanaticism that is rising as bemoaned by Tharoor, but it is the patriotism that is rising to protect the freedom and independence that you are enjoying without being tortured or killed. Tharoor knows fully well that he cannot find fault with Muslims for their atrocities for the last 10 centuries nor can he smell the filth spread by Christian missionaries. He is trying to wreck the ship of freedom and non-violence for the authoritarianism and violence. Tharoor stated that “I reject the presumption that the purveyors of hatred speak for all or even most Hindus.  The Hindutva ideology is in fact a malign distortion of Hinduism.”(271)

But unfortunately, he is dead wrong. He may be a scholar, nationalist, secularist, a fiction writer and liberal. Regrettably he lived in fiction, not with the history. His whole book was to demean Hindu leaders and side with the interests of Muslims who menaced the earth for the last 17 centuries and who depleted more than one million Hindus over the years.

Will Durant, the US Historian summarized the atrocities as thus: “The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.” Tharoor would shed no tears for millions of Hindus who were massacred during the time of Independence. It appears he would like to see analogous situation soon without learning from the past experience. Past is a guide for future. He wants to ignore the history. Let us look at few reports narrated by Time magazine.

Time Magazine, 8th September 1947: “You have full liberty to go the limit. Take revenge as you like, but if there is one Hindu or Sikh left alive in my district after you are through, I swear to kill them myself.” – Deputy Commissioner of a Western Punjab District in Pakistan to young Muslims A member of the U.S. Embassy arrived in Lahore from Delhi with another tale of horror. Reaching the small station of Okara, near Montgomery, he found the station platform utterly deserted except for several hundred dead Hindus and Sikhs lying around the platform, apparently slaughtered only a few hours before while waiting for the train to escape.

All these people were workers in a textile mill which had been attacked by Moslems. Their bodies were mostly stripped and in several instances limbs had been torn from the bodies. The wife of a British textile factory manager told how a Moslem mob had attacked the Hindu and Sikh workers in another factory. When Moslems broke into the ground floor, the Sikhs slashed the throats of their own wives, and afterwards tried to fight through themselves. All were killed.

Time Magazine, 15th September 1947: Near Rohri in Pakistan several hundred Moslems stopped a train, hauled out 13 Sikhs, clubbed them to death with hockey sticks. An Indian Army courier told how, in the remote Shakirgarh district of Pakistan, a small Hindu military force had found only 1,500 known survivors from a community of 120,000 Sikhs. He estimated that over 100,000 had been butchered, caught between a howling Moslem mob and the flooded Ravi river.

Time Magazine, 27th October 1947: The Eyewitness. On this point, the witness Niranjan Singh, a Sikh, testified. Singh, a few weeks ago a prosperous merchant in the Montgomery district of the Punjab, now moves about New Delhi on crutches. He said:” I shall never rest until revenge is taken upon the Moslems for all the wicked atrocities they have perpetrated upon innocent people. Moslems killed my old father, abducted my young daughter, slew my son and maimed my foot. No mercy whatsoever should be shown to them. I’ve always treated my Moslem laborers with kindness, but the dirty swine have repaid me with brutality.”

West Bengal is Burning Tharoor would not mention about the atrocities committed and heinous crimes inflicted against Hindus. His bigoted and hypocritical mind would dare not the subject of Muslims in West Bengal and the rest of India. Infiltration of Muslims from Bangladesh to destabilize West Bengal is not recognized by Tharoor.

The rapes the Muslims committed against Hindu girls do not concern Tharoor.      West Bengal has recently become the graveyard of Hindus thanks to Muslim appeasement policy being followed by all political parties for decades. Prasun Maitra reports “After destroying the police station, the Muslim mob turned their attention towards properties belonging to Hindus. They selective attacked Hindu houses and shops, damaged the properties, looted their belongings, molested Hindu women. Absolute lawlessness loomed all over the area for several hours until huge police force along with RAF were called from district headquarters and deployed in the area.”

On the morning of 29 January 2015, large scale violence rocked Usti market in South 24 Parganas district of West Bengal. More than 50 Hindu shops were ransacked, looted and gutted by a mob of rioting Muslims. Properties and cash worth more than a crore were looted from the shops belonging to Hindus.

On dated - December 13th to 16th December 2016 -  60 Hindu houses, shops were put in Islamist devastation, put in bombing, arson, torture, looting at Dhulagarh (at Howrah) and what not! Worth of Crores of cash, jewelry, materials, water pump-power.tiller-sewingmachines etc. and other valuables were looted or otherwise destroyed. Hindu temples and women were also attacked by the Allah-Quran followers who came to Dhulagarh for attending Hazrat Muhammad’s birthday rally.

Between 208 and 2015, nearly 40 incidents were recorded by the Hindu Samhita and few newspapers about the atrocities committed by Muslims ranging from rape, looting, burning and killing.


Islamic Violence in India and Across the Globe

In 2011, Charlie Hebdo's office in Paris was firebombed by Muslim terrorist brothers killing 11 people and injuring 11 people for publishing a mocking picture of Prophet Mohammad.

2017 Barcelona attacks - Three separate attacks in Barcelona (location pictured) kill at least fifteen people and injured more than one hundred others. "Authorities believe the men to be part of 12-member Islamic Terror cell.”

The June 2017 London Bridge attack, was an incident where a van ran over multiple pedestrians on the London Bridge. On Borough Market the occupants of the van stabbed multiple people before being shot by police.

2016 Uri attack – Four armed militants attacked on Indian Army brigade headquarters in Uri area of Baramulla district in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, India. 18 Soldiers were killed in the ambush and 19 were injured.

In June 2016, 49 people were killed and 53 injured in a mass shooting at a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. The shooter, Omar Mateen, pledged allegiance to ISIL by specifically calling police and journalists several times during the incident

In January 2016 Pathankot attack suspected Jaish-e-Mohammed militants attacked an Indian air base killing 7 security force members. Several injured.

NOTE:  Part 3 will be published soon.  



Please DONATE. Your donations are appreciated to continue the work.

NOTE: GHHF is exempt from federal income tax under section 501 (c) 3 of the Internal Revenue code.   

Our tax ID # 41-2258630

Donate at: (click ‘Donate’ button on right side).

Where to send your DONATIONS?
Global Hindu Heritage Foundation
14726 Harmony Lane, Frisco, TX 75035.
Your donations are tax deductible. Our Tax ID: # 41-2258630
Any questions, call: Prakasarao Velagapudi 601-918-7111


Posts Hinduism

Related Posts